Tampilkan postingan dengan label Fundamentals. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Fundamentals. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 05 Desember 2011

every stock has to crash someday

a stock has to crash some day.

many small caps remain small caps
all thru their life
and fade away as penny stocks.
some become mid caps
and few large caps!

when a penny or new comer company behind the stock starts growing
the stock starts rising much faster than the growth.
its because the price the stock commands in the market
includes the stocks prsent worth as well as its futuristic expected and estimated worth.

with time penny stock becomes small cap and then medium cap.
the premium that stock commands till that time is very high.
thereafter, the increase in growth rate determines the premium and not the growth itself.

for example, if the growth of the company were to be 12% viz a viz 15% it has been clocking since some quarters or years the share price of the company is set to nose dive despite that fact it is still growing. reason? the premium of ever-increasing growth expectation needs to come down.

if the dream run of the conpamy has not ended till that time
it still continues thereafter
but the management increasingly finds it difficult
to maintain the scorching (rather ever increasing and often unreasonable) rate of growth.

it fails to live upto the unreasonably high expectations.
expectations decide the stock price more than the reality which limits itself to bookvalue.

some companies finally go global, increase their market size to keep growing.
but in doing so they face increasing competition, price pressures etc.
and hence start struggling.

but some great great companies
survive this jet thrust and
keep growing.

but in the process they only delay the inevitable.
they again reach the stage sooner or later
when they find it difficult to match the expectations and p/e of the share holders.

some very smart companies buck even this reality.

they divide the company into many companies, make every new baby focus on a core competence and try and maintain the growth pace.

some succeed, some succumb.

even those who succeed, again face the growth speedbreaker and stumble at the growth sustainence promise to the investors.and mind you, i have not yet discussed the effects of recession, effects of changes in technology which render many a company obsolete etc.

finally, the inevitable happens.
company's growth rate starts tapering.
the premium dissolves and evaporates.

the blue eyed boy removes the goggles of promise, wears the spectacles of respect and reputation and accepts the valuation directed towards its book value with a consolation of annual pension called dividend.
every stock has to crash someday to ground of reality.
how long that can be prolonged is the real question.

those who buy blue eyed babies and keep the stocks in lockers, must take out and encash them while the baby has still not reached the middleage.

Sabtu, 06 Agustus 2011

the real fundamentals - IX


can a company with "good fundamentals" sink almost overnight?

sounds like a wrong question.

not if you know

that satyam's fundamentals were as sound as the foundation of a dam

before it collapsed in the fall of 2008 !

it was then the fourth largest indian i.t. company

threatening to threaten the giants!

--

lesson = fundamentals of fundamentals are more important than the fundamentals.

rag pickers


many people hate rag pickers.

i don't.

i admire them
for searching for value
amidst heaps of abandoned bits and pieces.

not surprisingly
many a times
they find valuables therein.

but for them
those precious things
which got in the wrong heap
would have been either lost
or ended up
in the stomach of a fish
and hence on the table of a rich merchant.

--

i, too, from one point of view
am a rag picker.

well, not as well and as passionate one.
but definitely i am trying to be one.

every other day
whenever i am in mood
and have money in my pocket
i remove my "comfort" shoes
roll-up my "casual" sleeves
cover up my "impulsive" nose
and get into
a new heap
of abandoned
stocks!

amidst the soiled
dusty
greasy
worn
torn
broken
rusted
outdated
and
dead stocks

quite often
i do locate
a still-breathing
promising
potential stock
not deserving to be there
but in my portfolio!

i bring them home
wash them under the light of facts and figures
shake them up to hear the sound of promise
and put them on my investing table.

the real fundamentals - VIII


how and where do we get all this info?

- read a lot of business newspapers (rs.5/-)

- read as many business magazines u can lay ur hands on (rs.50 per mag on an avg)

- watch a hell lot of interviews of businessmen on business channels

- watch a hell lot of interviews of analysts on channels.

- read a heaven lot of good business portals

- use a lot of common sense, self-analyses (even at the risk of being wrong)

- visit companies and their offices and outlets, meet and talk to their employees, vendors, distributers; use their products.

-----

after all this

just close your eyes

and let ur inner voice do the talking.

------

practice practice practice

trust yourself........

the real fundamentals - VII


is a fundamentally ok CHEAP (ECONOMICAL) stock worth investing in?

---

i am sure u can answer this one after the discussion before this.

-----

being cheap or not cheap is immaterial.

what matters is

- potential

- leadership and management to exploit it

- growth

- right price

the real fundamentals - VI

is a company or business with great potential necessarily worth investing?

let's take an example.

is africa a small continent? 
no

is africa devoid of natural resources? 
no

is africa without human resource? 
no

does africa have consumption potential? 
mind boggling!

so, why isn't there explosive growth?

well......simple

the potential has to be exploited

somebody has to harness the potential

turn the potential into reality.

nodoubt against asian gdp of $21,504 billion

african gdp stands at just $ 2,092 billion

===

lesson : potential rusts without great leadership, good management.

=====

is it surprising, china is getting into africa big time?

not to forget bharti airtel's african safari!!!

the real fundamentals - V


is a well-managed company which has tremendous scope of GROWTH

necessarily a good company to invest?

lets take an example......

monsanto is a hi-technology company which is into research and production of

"super seeds" to feed "the billions" in future!

everyone knows its future potential.

everyone wanted to be on its bandwagon.

the result?

p/e ratio of 35 v/s 22 of peers!!!

meaning, people are already paying 35 times their share is earning?

meaning, people are just paying future price (35 times)!

people are simply betting on the bet!!!

---

nothing succeeds like success.

and nothing grows like growth.

people come to know about the growth

before the growth knows that its growing.

the rest of the act is completed by the operators.

result? unbelievably high price! poor bargain.

if you buy the dream, you have to wait for the morning

a decade away!

(no wonder monsanto india's share price shot to 2000/- in 2004, and is still there!

smart dumb people call it "consolidation")

lesson?

if its not a bargain

it is not worth it

even if it is a rocket!

the real fundamentals - IV

are all fundamentally sound companies good for investing?

lets see an example.

lets consider a sugar company which is fundamentally all ok.

is it a good idea to invest in it?

especially, when more and more people are becoming health conscious

and are realising the importance of reducing the sugar intake?

when more and more people are starting to use low-calorie sugar substitutes?

when the farmers are becoming more and vociferous in their cost of produce?

so?

what do you feel?

will you still INVEST in a sugar stock

except for DIVIDEND?

what if you have the choice to invest in a company which makes sugar-substitute?

--

what's the lesson?

fundamental strength is not something to go ga-ga about!

fundamental strength is a hygiene factor these days.

a company has to be, i repeat, HAS TO BE fundamentally good

to qualify for our attention.

but to win our money for investment

it has to be much more than "fundamentally good".

--

it has to have "growth" written on its forehead.

===========================================

now what if

the sugar company decides

- to spread its geographical reach?

- to integrate vertically - e.g. grow its own sugarcane, make sugar concentrates, make candies etc etc?

- to enter hi-refined sugar segment?

- to come out with "low calorie" sugar?

that's growth....and now it qualifies to be taken seriously.

otherwise, it is good for trading only.

the real fundamentals - III


there are three crucial questions:

1. is the business (say aviation or sugar or liquor or fmcg etc etc) good or bad?

2. is the management running the business good or bad or mediocre?

3. are the times good or bad?

if times are bad, no problemat all. rather, it is mouth watering.

if management is bad, it is a big problem,

but if business is wrong...........???

the real fundamentals - II


if the past performance doesn't necessarily indicate future performance

how come fundamental analyses based on the past and present figures indicate future figures?

--

before touching a company for investing

ask three more questions

- is it profitable? (if not, can it be profitable?)

- is it futuristic? (is it future-proof?)

- is it healthy? (even a profitable and futuristic business is bound to collapse if it is not healthy? poor corporate governance, unfaremeans, artificial unsustainable means, etc.)

--

as defined by wikipedia

"Fundamental analysis of a business involves analyzing its financial statements and health, its management and competitive advantages, and its competitors and markets."

.......seems like rocket science

.............enough complex to leave scope for alibis and excuses

--

don't analyse the mountains of fundamental data yourself.

don't reinvent the wheel.

learn to analyse the analyses of fundamental analysts.

there are hundreds out there, all nervous enough not to be wrong.

the real fundamentals - I


does high p/e ratio indicate good future? shaky future?

does high book to price ratio indicate bright future? dark future?

does high debt on the balancesheet indicate prosperity in future? bleak future?

......?????

well, it can be both!!!

one of the biggest myths of fundamental analyses is

"if u know the numbers and ratios, you can know the fundamentals of a company!"

i can show you n number of examples
when despite a bad set of numbers, a company gave 1000% returns in less than 2 years!

don't believe me?

just take out tata motors chart

share value on 20/2/2009 = 134

share value on 15/12/2009=1340

every ratio in the encyclopaedia of fundamental analyses (FA) was as red as it could have been.

still, it turned out to be as golden as it can be!!!

so, what is real FA?

what does it mean?

what all includes the real FA? what to look for???????

Jumat, 29 Juli 2011

platinum rule of trading


have u ever been to pushkar?

it's famous globally
for its pushkar fair.

hundreds of shops are set up
to trade camels, horses, bulls, cows and much more.

very hard bargaining takes place.

prices as high as five times the correct price can be quoted initially!

many traders throng the place
spend a day or two
to trade the livestock.

everyone wants
the best
for the least.

every animal gets sold
except
(and this is what i want to underline)
....except
the sick ones
or the ones with some or the issue.

hardly any trader in his thinking cap
is interested in an animal
he is not sure of its survival.

but very very surprisingly
in stock market
everyday
thousands and lacs of traders
trade in (live)stocks
which are not only sick
but seriously sick.
some are
shockingly
terminally sick!

since nobody can see the stock
unlike a horse or a cow,
hardly any amateur retail trader
bothers to check the health
of the stock he or she
is going to trade.

the result?

operators play their tricks
and the innocent traders
get trapped
amidst sick stocks
with little or no chance
of returning to health
atleast not so soon!
they are left with no choice
except to either keep bleeding
or book loss.

so,
here is the lesson
a crucial critical one
- never trade in fundamentally weak stocks
always trade in fundamentally strong ones.

so that
even if the operators play their games
(which they will)
you will still be
amidst
healthy camels
with enough "water"
to survive any desert.

trading in sick stocks
(fundamentally weak)
is like
swinging on the circus ropes
without safety net.

trading in weak stocks
is like playing
the devils game
with the devil.

Rabu, 27 Juli 2011

fundamental bites


---------------------

per capita consumption of paints in India is very low at 1.5 kgs/year compared to 15-20 kgs in developed countries.

when seen in context of india's population, the numbers are mind boggling.

big big long term upside in good paint companies. lot of growth opportunities.

11 laws of averaging declining stocks


1. average only the fundamentally strong stocks. never average the weak.

2. time the averaging on the basis of technical indicators.

3. never average blindly the losers. all losers are not worth averaging. fundamentally weak should be handled as per the law 4.

4. average the fundamentally strong losers by selling the fundamentally weak losers.

5. averaging is not bad. rather, it is an opportunity. you get an opportunity to accumulate more of the good stock at even lower price.

6. never average if you want quick results. don't average for the short term.

7. don't average if you can't digest the stock slipping further.

8. never average in one go. average in steps.

9. don't hesitate to average the fundamentally strong stocks even in bear markets.

10. there is no end to the number of times you can keep averaging a fundamentally strong stock. provided, ofcourse, your judgement of the fundamental strength of the stock is correct.

11. never average in f&o. average only in delivery.

Jumat, 01 Juli 2011

should technical traders be bothered about fundamentals?

yes and no.

yes, because you come to know which tantrum of indicator to react to

and which to ignore.

you know the broader logic and winds.

--

no, because the fundamentals

(including the perception of the fundamental

and the unknown, unrevealed, hidden causes)

are priced in the chart.

any further weighing in of the fundamentals

over and above what the indicators are saying

can cause

overemphasis

and hence

over-reaction.

--

technical traders should trade

purely on the basis of the technicals

read under the light of broader fundamental currents.

fundamental sense will help you identify

which indicator indications to ignore.

--

in the words of

lawrence livingstone

in

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator



"there is always a reason for fluctuations,

but the tape does not concern

itself with the why and wherefore.

It doesn't go into explanations.

I didn't ask the tape why when I was fourteen, and

I don't ask it today, at forty.

The reason for what a certain stock does today

may not be known for two or three days,

or weeks, or months.

But what the dickens does that matter?

Your business with the tape is now -- not tomorrow.

The reason can wait.

But you must act instantly or be left.

Time and again I see this happen.

You'll remember that Hollow Tube went down

three points the other day

while the rest of the market rallied sharply.

That was the fact.

On the following Monday you saw that the directors passed the dividend.

That was the reason.

They knew what they were going to do,

and even if they didn't sell the stock themselves they at least didn't buy it.

There was no inside buying;

no reason why it should not break. "